The Maryland Higher Education Commission (MHEC) website served everyone from prospective students to state policymakers through a single, undifferentiated experience — buried in PDFs, duplicated content, and broken links. As a UX researcher on the redesign, I helped rebuild the information architecture around the people who actually use it.
MHEC is the State of Maryland's higher-education coordinating body. Its website is a front door for a remarkably broad set of people — each arriving with different goals, vocabulary, and levels of expertise.
When a single site tries to serve all of them the same way, no one is served well. A parent looking for financial aid, a policymaker looking for state data, and a university administrator filing a report shouldn't have to wade through each other's content to find their own.
Before proposing anything, we needed to know what the site actually held and how real users expected it to be organised. The research combined a full content audit with hands-on input from thirty participants.
A full audit of existing pages, documents, and links to surface duplication, PDFs, and dead ends.
Participants grouped and labelled content in their own words, revealing how each audience expects the site to be organised.
Benchmarked discoverability and structure against peer state agencies to find gaps and opportunities.
Synthesised the audiences into clear personas so design decisions stayed anchored to real user needs.



The audit surfaced a tangle of structural issues — most concentrated on the Research & Publications pages, where information that should have been browsable lived almost entirely inside documents.
Core information — especially across Research & Publications — was locked inside PDFs instead of living as accessible, searchable web pages.
The same information appeared in multiple places, creating confusion about which version was current and authoritative.
Navigation paths led to dead ends, eroding trust and leaving users stranded mid-task.
Weak structure and document-heavy content hurt discoverability and made the site harder to use for everyone.
Across every issue, one pattern stood out: the site made no distinction between its audiences. MHEC employees, students, parents, and faculty all funnelled through the same undifferentiated structure.
When a site serves everyone the same way, it serves no one well — each visitor has to dig through everyone else's content to find their own.
That reframed the brief. The redesign wasn't about restyling pages — it was about giving each audience a clear, dedicated path, and lifting information out of PDFs into pages people could actually find, read, and act on.
We proposed a restructured site map that leads with audience, surfaces the most common tasks, and replaces document dumps with real pages.



The proposed structure introduced a Parents & Students entry point, a Degree & School Search, a Highlights section, clear user separation by audience, and a shift toward more pages and fewer PDFs.
The cornerstone change: a clear entry point for each group, so visitors land in content built for them instead of sifting through everyone else's.
Aid, programs, school search
Planning & paying for college
Reporting & compliance
State data & policy
Browsable data, not PDFs
Personas kept every structural decision tied to real people and their goals.

The new structure carried through to a refreshed homepage and a responsive mobile experience.


We presented the redesign back to MHEC stakeholders, and they preferred it over the existing site — alongside a set of branding strategies to carry the new structure forward.
"So much better."
— MHEC stakeholder, on the proposed redesign
Each user group gets a dedicated path instead of one undifferentiated menu.
Information lifted out of documents into accessible, searchable pages.
A cleaner structure improves discoverability and accessibility for everyone.
Recommendations to give the refreshed site a consistent identity.
The natural follow-up is tree testing and moderated usability testing on the new architecture to validate that each audience can complete its top tasks faster — turning the qualitative client preference into measured task-success gains.